Subject:
|
Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Dec 1999 00:13:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
41 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> Why we shouldn't post copies of retailer catalogs is because we weren't meant
> to see them in the first place. It's a matter of respect, if not legalities,
> worst come to worst.
I agree with you, in the general case. However, I think it's fair to state
that Lego does not have a consistent policy regarding the dealer/retailer
catalogue:
(James Powell wrote:)
> TRU in Victoria has the retail catalog out on the end of the shelf. All it is
> is a full description of what a retail outlet can order from lego. The price
> sheet is -not- part of it, and that is the only remotely sensitive piece of
> the catalog.
(Huw Millington wrote:)
> I do not know how my correspondent came to be in posession of the catalogue,
> but I think its safe to say that he was given it, and did not steal it or
> otherwise illegally obtain it. • (and)
> In 1995 I and another AFOL in the UK were sent 1996 retailers catalogues
> through the post at the beginning of December by a LEGO UK empolyee
(Todd Lehman wrote:)
> Retailers aren't even supposed to show these catalogs to customers. In fact,
> employees at the MoA LIC have said in the past that they could even lose
> their *jobs* for showing a retailer catalog to customers
Several people who are not retailers have indicated having or seeing these
catalogues in the past, as well. If it is truly Lego's desire to keep this
information confidential, they are being very arbitrary in their enforcement.
Now, idle curiosity prompts me to ask (of those who have seen one): Does the
catalogue have any indication in it which prohibits redistribution?
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
| (...) I have a copy of what I believe to be the 1993 dealer catalog. I can't read French, but the English part does not. That's the catalog book itself, I never saw the outside packaging, if any existed. The only thing is that the back of the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
| (...) Hollywood "insider gossip" is a little different, Jonathan. Movie rumors and leaked trade secrets rarely infringe on copyrights at respectable sites. How many "Hollywood news sites" do you see with illicit movie scripts or leaked scans of (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
