 | | Re: The Solarian Imperial Archive is back!
|
|
(...) I never said backstory was pointless or even brought that up. I'm not sure where you're going exactly but I'll go with it. Here's how it is: If you don't have some great MOCs to begin with no one reads your stories. Even then most people skip (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Solarian Imperial Archive is back!
|
|
(...) I decided to give my MOCs a backstory, pointless perhaps, but I don't really care. Politely, just because you don't personally like to give your MOCs a backstory, it doesn't mean that others share your same inclination, witness the dozens of (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Solarian Imperial Archive is back!
|
|
(...) So I ask politely...what is the point of the website? You should at the very least link to (URL) BSV>. Brickshelf is horrid enough on it's own, much less jumping out at you on a website. (URL) [ j o n ] (URL) zemi.net> (URL) moonbase> (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | The Solarian Imperial Archive is back!
|
|
Finally, after a year of procrastination, I've gotten my site a new host. Ozbricks stopped hosting without any warning, damn them. Anyhow, here it is: (URL) For the Empire! (URL) (21 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickShelf having issues?
|
|
(...) Seems like some kind of DOS - my main gallery page is loading very slowly, sub-folders are getting "connection refused". ROSCO (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | BrickShelf having issues?
|
|
Going in via the normal www.brickshelf.com url gives (after some delay) nothing.. just a blank screen or a 404. Going in via Asphodel.org/bsv gives a nifty error message... after some delay. (er, well, it WAS giving a nifty error message, now it (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Trains logo - need scan
|
|
Tim - simply outstanding! Thank you very much! Bryan "Tim Strutt" <heidi.strutt@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:HwuADs.17Lq@lugnet.com... (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Trains logo - need scan
|
|
(...) Well, this sounded like a worthy cause, so I scanned a Train Logo from an old catalogue at 300dpi, cleaned it up in Paint Shop Pro, and uploaded it to Brickshelf for your viewing pleasure: (URL) Strutt (21 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Trains logo - need scan
|
|
Thanks for the link. Unfortunately this logo is rather small and won't scale up without a lot of pixelation. Anyone else have a good, high resolution scan of the Lego Trains logo? Bryan "M. Moolhuysen" <moom@NOSPAM-chello.nl> wrote in message (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Trains logo - need scan
|
|
(...) I haven't found the first one bearing the steam engine silhouette, but the second logo, although with noticeably larger lettering, is available near the top left corner of Lugnet's Train news page: (URL) to me this logo seems to be a (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Trains logo - need scan
|
|
Does anyone have a nice high quality scan of the Lego Trains logo? In particular - I'm looking for the logo that appears in the upper left of this page: (URL) the more common: (URL) help with this is appreciated. I'm doing some re-organizing for my (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | LEGO.com Nominated for a Webby!
|
|
That's right, our favorite toy company's web site is up for a Webby award! LEGO.com has been nominated for the Best Practices category. Take a look here: (URL) can sign up to vote for the Webby awards by following this link: (URL) go, sign up, and (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.lego, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Embedding FTX in messages
|
|
Got it! It looks like my error was including the (URL) portion of the URL. Thanks! That's exactly what I was looking for. <</~524/sigfile>> (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Embedding FTX in messages
|
|
(...) It's exactly the same as including images, with the double angle brackets, however the page must reside on Lugnet, see the page from the </publish/ftx/guide/ FTX guide> included below. This was included using <</publish/ftx/guide...sclusion>> (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Embedding FTX in messages
|
|
(...) Hi Dan, Here's what the LUGNET FTX guide has to say: (URL) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Embedding FTX in messages
|
|
This might seem like a silly question, but I don't think I've seen it covered before. How do I embed an ftx page in a posted message? I've got the page set up and ready to go, but I can't find any instructions on how to do this. Currently, it (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | zemi.net
|
|
My site recently went live for what I feel like is the first time. This is its 4th and best build. Kyle Keppler helped me with the php and he is awesome. Check it out: (URL) [ j o n ] (URL) zemi.net> (URL) moonbase> (21 years ago, 12-Apr-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.publish, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.general, lugnet.space, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: good camera to get?
|
|
(...) Yes, red eye is a major problem with minifig photography. Their eyes just don't react properly to the pre-flash. Kerry (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: good camera to get?
|
|
(...) I bought the Cannon Power Shot A60. Its a 2 Mega pixel camera with optical and digital zoom, macro setting, panoramic "stitching" as well as it takes AVi movies with sound. It also is being reduced in price now that the new models are out. In (...) (21 years ago, 2-Apr-04, to lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: good camera to get?
|
|
(...) And, as I found, a much more frustrating one as you muck around with phone books, boxes and the like to get the relative heights correct, then muck around trying to get the camera back into its correct position on the beanbag when you press (...) (21 years ago, 2-Apr-04, to lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
|
