| | LEGO photo exhibit / photography seminars
|
|
I've been thinking a lot over the past couple months whether I should give a talk on LEGO photography. Is there something like this already planned? I could see doing as many as four talks: - A hands-on workshop on studio lighting -- bring your own (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
|
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
(...) the cameras I have researched there -- and the lack of negative remarks makes me wonder about their conclusions. IIRC, the site is very closely linked to Ritz Cameras online. Makes one wonder... I figure you can't go wrong with some of the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
|
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
"Aaron Muhl" <Aaron_Muhl@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HDu527.oEJ@lugnet.com... (...) I've (...) around (...) flash (...) a (...) photo (...) (URL) > (...) Here are some tips on looking for a digital camera: Look for high optical zoom. Digital (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
|
|
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
(...) Here's a link to the review from Steve's Digicams. (URL) in the market for a Digital Camera will want to check out the reviews there: it is my first stop when looking for a new camera. The review does note a macro-mode (close-up) of 1.6 (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
|
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
(...) Well, whatever it is Troy is using, here is a picture of it as well as a picture of how it pictures-- (URL) C. (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
|
|
| | RE: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
(...) Actually, I have the 990, which is one model earlier than the 995. Troy is using a Canon EOS D10 these days. I'm quite happy with all the features on my camera...manual/automatic focus, f-stop, shutter speed, white balance, flash, etc. The (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
|
|
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
(...) Bram, as well as Troy Cefaratti, both have the Coolpix 995, and I have the Coolpix 4500 (which is basically the 995's followup). They're the split-body design, and I love my camera dearly. They are more mid-to top of the line than the camera (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
|
|
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
"Aaron Muhl" <Aaron_Muhl@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HDu527.oEJ@lugnet.com... (...) camera (...) Don't use it but I know Bram uses a Coolpix camera. He's been a bit un-Lugnet lately due to school (so he most likely won't see this) but you might (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
|
|
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
(...) You could set the Followups back to lugnet.publish.photography when you do things like that, theres always the risk of annoying ppl.. See this review: (URL) sure you can find a lot more if you search the 'net. Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
|
| | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
|
Since I'm not really getting anywhere in publish.photography, I was wondering if the two largest groups could comment. Anybody used this camera listed below? Thanks, Aaron "Aaron Muhl" <Aaron_Muhl@yahoo.com> wrote in message (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
|