 | | Re: Photographer etiquette questionnaire/survey
|
|
(...) Last year, there were plenty of times when the display rooms were quiet, and an involved photo-session would be unlikely to disturb anyone. If you want to get really detailed shots of someone's creation, it might be a good idea to make (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographer etiquette questionnaire/survey
|
|
(...) Ya, flashes aren't really needed much anymore with modern digital cameras... but using a flash can still make a difference -- especially with a CCD-based digital camera. CMOS imaging chips don't suffer from the same "snowy pixel" effects that (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Brickmania's Gallery Updated - Brickshelf Pix Posted
|
|
I'm just letting everyone know that I have updated my web site's gallery to include all of the pictures recently withdrawn from Brickshelf. Most of them are military MOC's, but there's a lot of other gems and even some new stuff spread throught the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographer etiquette questionnaire/survey
|
|
(...) Not specifically BF, but generally.... (...) yes,yes (...) yes,depends (see below),no (...) generally fine, long as its not derogatory or anything. (...) no (...) Depends on the show. Generally I'd prefer this not to be done at a show. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographer etiquette questionnaire/survey
|
|
(...) Yes. Yes. If I were going to Brickfest (and I'm not, sniff), I would be bringing things for public display. (...) Yes. No. No. On this last, I have no idea why someone is taking pictures--maybe they're just into trains and so they don't care (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: deep linking on brickshelf (It's Illegal!)
|
|
Todd, It is not illegal to deep link to your own property. Jude (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: deep linking on brickshelf (It's Illegal!)
|
|
Deep Linking is Illegal! According to recent press releases and court rulings, deep linking to a web site is illegal. (URL) have indicated that this is a major legal issue. (URL) course, all of this comes after a court ruling that said 2 years ago (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Photographer etiquette questionnaire/survey
|
|
(...) Ideally I'd like to take 2-5 minutes. 10-20 minutes would be toward the extreme. The last thing I want to do is get in the way, so you shoo me away at any time if that happens -- my stuff is pretty portable. My lighting is just a pair of (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.publish.photography)
|
| |
| | Re: deep linking on brickshelf
|
|
(...) Yep! That's the way I do it and it works just fine. For folders/pictures that haven't been made available yet you just have to be signed in as the folder owner to do this. (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: deep linking on brickshelf
|
|
(...) After uploading, you as the author can view each pic, then click on the pic itself. The URL in your address box in your browser is the deep link to paste in, I believe. Hope that helps. (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
