 | | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
ty for replying Kevin. Granted I understand the sensitivity around some of the Testament chapters but he's got several other projects that have no offensive nature except possibly in their colour schemes. My question is why there was a carpet policy (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
What's the difference between "deep links" and just plain links? -- Thanx~ Nicole (URL) Loch" <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote in message news:GyrF5M.14w@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) I should also add that almost all of the off topic folders that are deleted on Brickshelf *would* be on-topic on Geekshelf. In fact that is one of the main reasons I opened Geekshelf. KL (23 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) He has uploaded a handful of images in the past that were not (according to me). Therefore I want to carefully review all of them to make sure they are all kid-safe. The subject matter (the Bible) deals with alot of very adult topics that (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) You forgot to add IMHO or IMO to that sentence. (Note that I'm not claiming that they are, but I certainly now people who might think that). (...) I don't think the bible as endorsed by most Christian churches necessarily contains pictures. (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
