 | | Re: Lego vs. Pokemon —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | (...) Two words: Beanie Babies. *That* market dried up; Pokemon took its place... Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego vs. Pokemon —Kya Morden
|
| | | | | (...) I still see Beanie Babies all over the place, sure, there's not riots for them, but they're still there. Also, you forget that Pokemon is inherently a video game with marketing devices in the form of toys, tv shows, a movie, and cards. Kya (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego vs. Pokemon —Alex Roode
|
| | | | | | | (...) Beanie Babies are suposed to go out in December or 2000. As for Pikachu replacing Mario? That CAN'T be possible! I hate pika and i love mario! And guess what? Pokemon Yellow has less pokemon in it then red or blue which is crazy. Oh. And (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego vs. Pokemon —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | | | (...) place... (...) The *toys* are still there, but the market is all but gone. (...) You've forgotten the best feature of Pokemon, and the biggest thing it has in common with Beanine Babies, Hello Kitty, etc.: it's a short-term revenue machine (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego vs. Pokemon —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Three word? Pokemon Beanie Babies... (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lego vs. Pokemon —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | (...) Okay, four words: Hello Pokemon Beanie Babies... Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lego vs. Pokemon —Nick Goetz
|
| | | | Five: Where is this thread heading? -Nick Sproaticus wrote in message <382AFAE8.F4CE117E@io.com>... (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.promo)
|
| | | | |
