To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.piratesOpen lugnet.pirates in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Pirates / 896
895  |  897
Subject: 
Re: Uncertain Definition of a Ship Type...?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.pirates
Date: 
Mon, 8 May 2000 21:12:49 GMT
Viewed: 
918 times
  
In lugnet.pirates, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:


Okay...now what do you call the "bonus mast" on a schooner with *four*
masts...?

Foremast, foreward mainmast, mainmast, and mizzen.  And I have no doubt that
there are exceptions to the rule.  When a mizzen becomes a jigger, I don't
know.

Or do the rules go out the window when money flies innuendo...no, wait, wrong
ending.  I mean, do rules go out the window when you no longer have "true"
ship-rigs?  What on Earth do you call the four bonus masts on the _Thomas W.
Lawson_?

incitingly,

Lindsay

Dunno what the Thomas W. Lawson is.

Bruce



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Uncertain Definition of a Ship Type...?
 
(...) Why, when it dances! (rim shot) (...) The _Thomas W. Lawson_ holds the world's record for most masts on a sailing ship. T'was a 1910s schooner, IIRC, and it had *seven* masts. I have no idea what you'd call the four extras. Interesting page, (...) (25 years ago, 9-May-00, to lugnet.pirates)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Uncertain Definition of a Ship Type...?
 
Hi. (...) I was waiting for this. I tossed you a soft pitch, and fully expected you to hit it out of the park. ;) (...) Oooh, thanks. I was more concerned about how it has historically been employed. "Bomb Ketch" is what I'm most familiar with. (...) (25 years ago, 7-May-00, to lugnet.pirates)

11 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR