Subject:
|
Re: John E. Doolittle
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.pirates
|
Date:
|
Sat, 29 Jan 2000 04:23:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4927 times
|
| |
| |
Dave Schuler wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.pirates, Lance Scott writes:
> > The tactic does still hold with turret mounted guns, the enemy can still only
> > bear a fraction of his firepower, while you can use all of yours.
> >
> > Missiles on the other hand negate that advantage entirely.
>
> Heh. Yeah, I guess it's a lot different when you can fire more-or-less from
> all directions...
Ok, sounds good.
So what's the late eighteenth/early nineteenth century equivalent of a
missile system - a carronade? ;-)
Richard
Still baldly going...
Check out Port Block at http://www.hinet.net.au/~rparsons/port/
Note the change in URL - Port Block is moving (to new and larger
accommodations)
Do adjust your set.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: John E. Doolittle
|
| On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Richard Parsons (<Fp2xL2.D31@lugnet.com>) wrote at 04:23:36 (...) I don't think so - carronades were only good a short range. You might be able to put a very large cannon on a very small, fast ship, but even so, you'd probably (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
Message is in Reply To:
99 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|