Subject:
|
Re: John E. Doolittle, weekly update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.pirates
|
Date:
|
Sun, 16 Jan 2000 18:34:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2323 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Richard Parsons (<FoFJJ0.76H@lugnet.com>) wrote at
13:15:26
> Let's see....
>
> I now have the required
> larger (and quite glamorous ;-) ship, and I'm fine with it starting out
> Brikish, or _even_ Brickish, but details gentlemen, details. What moral
> imperative? What brings Doolittle into the same orbit as a slaver? Who put
> the tribbles in the quadrotriticale, and what was in the grain that killed
> them? And why is something pear shaped such a bad thing anyway?
And I want some of the stuff *you're* on as well :-)
Not quite a moral imperative, but what if Aurora got captured somewhere,
and John E. needed a big ship to rescue her?
Good 'ole white slave trade. Chains, skimpy clothing, harems, Sultan of
somewhere or other, you get the picture. I only make the bullets,
someone else can fire 'em :-)
--
Tony Priestman
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: John E. Doolittle, weekly update
|
| Let's see.... Tim's 'lawyers giving marital advice' got a guernsey after all 'Brikish' stands for now, while the issue remains open The pics and description of Shangrila were filled out a bit There are a couple of pics of the HMS Guy Fawkes making (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
99 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
