Subject:
|
Re: Arrr, first message
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.pirates
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Sep 1999 20:05:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
848 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <FIH4ot.A6A@lugnet.com>, Bruce Schlickbernd
<corsair@schlickbernd.org> writes
>
> And how big would you be a-thinkin' a platoon be?
>
> Remember, no conjugating! :-)
Oh arr, oi be fergettin :-)
>
> How the heck big is a platoon of Imperial Guards? Red or blue? I think 3
> modern squads make a platoon, but 1600-1800?
Sorry, but I don't even know how big a squad is.
On the basis that everything Lego is a scaled down version of reality
(big sailing ships with a crew of 8, etc), I would suggest halving the
real numbers anyway :-)
So, assuming a squad is 6, a Lego squad would be 3. Three squads in a
platoon makes 9, plus an officer gives 10.
How's that?
(BTW, given the above numbering, I've got three and a half red platoons,
and a large contingent of staff officers, and a couple of squads of
blues :-)
--
Tony Priestman
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Arrr, first message
|
| (...) 10-12 more or less, kinda-sorta, depending on who's army you are talking about. (...) I'd probably make it 12 (three squads of four, officer in each squad, with one officer being the overall platoon leader). I don't know if that should be two (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.pirates)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Arrr, first message
|
| (...) And how big would you be a-thinkin' a platoon be? Remember, no conjugating! :-) How the heck big is a platoon of Imperial Guards? Red or blue? I think 3 modern squads make a platoon, but 1600-1800? Bruce (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.pirates)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
