 | | Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
|
o.k......Now what? We have our group site that we fought tooth and nail for and now it sits for days on end without any new postngs. The same can be said for all of the other new people groups too. Are we going to progress and come up with a theme (...) (20 years ago, 10-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
|
Steve DeCraemer wrote in message ... (...) for and now it sits for days on end without any new postngs. Personally, I am too busy fighting tooth and nail to make a house deal work to have much time for anything else. 'Course, I should have (...) (20 years ago, 10-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
|
Hello! (...) Maybe that's a good sign. This group was founded for those who felt uncomfortable posting certain things in the "normal" Lugnet newsgroups. So when nobody is posting to .lgbt it possibly means there is - currently - nobody feeling (...) (20 years ago, 10-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
|
(...) No, I'm feeling too uncomfortable to post... Afraid to be bashed all over Lugnet again... And that is no good. Not at all. Saskia (20 years ago, 10-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
|
This doesn't make any sense to me. It's like Monty Pythons "Life of Brian" when they talk about fighting for the right for men to have babies even though they can't physically have them. It would be like fighting for the legal right to marry and (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
|
(...) I know I didn't read ALL of the postings for the prior discussion, so I may have missed the ones Saskia is saying she was bashed in, but of the ones I did read, I didn't see anyone 'gay bashing', using crude/derogatory slangs at anyone else. (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
|
(...) (URL) "Come on, before the modern term of 'homosexual' was coined into English, everyone knew what a sodomite was..." 'Sodomite', in case you didn't know, is considered offensive and an insult. Even if this term wasn't used against someone, it (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
|
(...) Agreed. It is also inaccurate in that (at least in my view, which may be flawed because I'm hetero) having a preference and acting on that preference are not at all the same thing. (and the distinction goes a lot deeper than that) However I (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
|
(...) I believe 'sodomite' is an accurate term, and the way I used it was not to bash anyone. You neglected to show the context in which I used that word in the first place, which was to show that by the term 'sodomite' one would know both 'sexual (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
|
In lugnet.people.lgbt, Lee Meyer wrote: (sigh) FUT lugnet.off-topic.debate Lee, whatever your views, there are better ways and better places to bring them up. This is just tasteless. Soren (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
|
| |
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
|
Hi, Is this really lgbt lego oriented, or can this be moved to off topic? I didn't join this newsgroup to discuss what a sodomite is, frankly. Not that there is anything wrong with being one. Angela (20 years ago, 12-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
|
