 | | Subjects for this newsgroup —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | There was a good deal of discussion in the admin threads before this newsgroup was created, about what kind of subjects it might address, and whether they were more properly housed elsewhere or not. Many people made good arguments for various points (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Subjects for this newsgroup —Alfred Speredelozzi
|
| | | | (...) Makes sense in a kind of "feel it out" sort of way. What I am afraid of is that there will be a bunch of anti-LGBT people who post here wanting to start trouble. I am pretty sure this applies: (URL) To tell you the thruth, this newsgroup many (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Subjects for this newsgroup —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | "Alfred Speredelozzi" <alfredjr@alum.rpi.edu> wrote in message news:I4BM5C.2Dv@lugnet.com... (...) I will not sit here and be verbally attacked. That post was a sincere post which I thought relevant to this new thread under the terms of use and (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Subjects for this newsgroup —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) I'm with Alfred here--this NG is going to be like a lightning rod for those that want to prove a point--"Oh look, an article about the badness of homosexuality' or 'look, another dumb law excluding homosexuals from partaking in the same (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Subjects for this newsgroup —Manfred Moolhuysen
|
| | | | (...) Please explane why you conclude his question is hostile? Having read the thread, it seems that most pleople aswering to this post didn't share your negative feeling about it. With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
|
| | | | |
