|
|
 | | Re: Moving to Seattle
|
| (...) holy megablocks batman... I haven't seen ya on the chat for a while, I was starting to wonder if you were okay! wow J0n... awesome news! (23 years ago, 11-Mar-03, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: Moving to Seattle
|
| (...) yeah, and with how absent Mark's been lately, its almost like there's some evil plot hatching. oh no... I've said too much! (23 years ago, 11-Mar-03, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: Moving to Seattle
|
| (...) SNIPPOLA (...) Cool, you can build up your Alphabet fighter Lego collection again for a rainy day! . . . . . . . . . . Rain?! . . Seattle?! . . . HOT DIGGITY DOG, DUDE!!!!! Jeff (23 years ago, 11-Mar-03, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: Moving to Seattle
|
| (...) It's like a consolidation of .space-power. I bet [the evil] Grand Admiral Muffin Head is behind this. -Tim (23 years ago, 10-Mar-03, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: Moving to Seattle
|
| (...) Didn't Joel Kuester do this too? Jeez, what is this, a telepathic calling? (...) Thanks for the tip! (...) That's good to know. (...) -Rick (23 years ago, 10-Mar-03, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: Moving to Seattle
|
| Dude, no way! Well, nifty. The Grand Admiral is in Everett, just north of Seattle and That's where I'm looking to move as well. C'mon, you know you want to be up there with us, It'll make Everett the space capital for the NW. I'm not sure what kind (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-03, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: Gone for awhile
|
| "Xcalabur" <Xcalabur@rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:H9v2AI.34L@lugnet.com... (...) I'm (...) Just found this. My thoughts are with you. You've always been a great part of Lugnet. Do what you need to do but always remember you have a home (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-03, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Moving to Seattle
|
| Hey guys. I've been pretty absent lately with moving plans to a new job in Eureka Springs, Arkansas. Well I've just pulled a 180 and decided to decline the job, sell much of my stuff, and move to sunny Seattle. This isn't one of the most practical (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: The Construction Abilities of a Pickle
|
| (...) Just reminded me-- this may have been a fluke somewhere, but this set: (URL) had its age range change from 2001 to 2002! Also of note, it changed its piece count too (and various other box-art-tidbits). I'll have to check the boxes to see what (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-03, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: The Construction Abilities of a Pickle
|
| (...) One thing I was surprised to learn, is that one of the single most important factors in set design is the age rating on the side of the box. If it says for instance "8-12" on the box cover, then Marketing goes out and grabs a bunch of (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-03, to lugnet.people)
|
|
