To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.peopleOpen lugnet.people in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 People / 3170
3169  |  3171
Subject: 
Re: Suz Q&A was:[Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.people
Date: 
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 20:36:06 GMT
Viewed: 
825 times
  
In lugnet.lego.direct, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> > How does your status inform your views about TLC's level of participation
> > and the future of Lugnet in relation to TLC?
> I'm not entirely sure what I can say to this question really.. can you
> rephrase or elabarate?

I guess I meant: what did you learn from being on the *inside* that informs
your attitudes about the company overall and/or how to deal with them?

> I'm afraid what you mean is not TLC, but LD. My status and history with TLC
> has no real bearing on that of LUGNET's with LD. But, I suppose the things I
> know about -do- build a certain picture.

I'm not sure why the parent company has no relationship to the question, but
I think we'd like to see an answer concerning your overall impressions of
the company and where it is going, how they handle business relationships, etc.

What is that "certain picture"?

> singled out among..?
> > Do you feel constrained in ways that others are not?
> 'others' being...?

I just meant other websites dedicated to Lego. Brickshelf, FBTB, Brickset,
etc.  I wondered if you felt that Lugnet was treated unfairly in some way.

Just tell us what you think.  Maybe all that is needed is a statement about
Lugnet's future and intended direction, as both a property belonging to you
and Todd and as a community resource.  Just answering that might be hard enough.

Note: I originally wrote these questions as just general points of interest
concerning the earlier firestorm of controversy (and that as a kind of
defense of your apparent attitude absent better information) and not as some
formal list of interrogatories -- in the main, if you have thoughts you
think you could share with the lugnet community now might be a good time to
share them.  It is not my purpose to try and gain disclosures from you that
you do not wish to make, or even to engage you in a conversation that you
don't want to participate in.

-- Hop-Frog



Message is in Reply To:
  Suz Q&A was:[Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?]
 
Here are some short answers, for now.. (...) no. (...) I didn't disclose anything while I worked for TLC (1996-1999), but it's not a secret anymore. I worked for R&D. LEGO Futura, Boston office. LFB's job was to come up with cool, innovative LEGO (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.people)

134 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR