 | | Re: Apology for Jesse Long
|
|
Wow, all I can say is that I'm in shock. I come home to a flame war. Jesse, I'm trying to advocate for you, I'm trying to help you fit in better and I'm trying my best. I thought at first it was going to work, but you keep sending profane flames (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Apology for Jesse Long
|
|
"Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:GHLwqD.HsH@lugnet.com... (...) offensive (...) son of a (...) Lugnet. (...) response, and I (...) below... (...) <snip> I do not care what context it was in, I just had my 9 year old (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Apology for Jesse Long
|
|
-snipped J.A.L.'s usual BS- (...) And what creations have you shown us here on LUGNET? None. You can't install MLCAD on your computer and build your models on the computer. What are you, 20 years-old? Wow, I know young teenages who can run MLCAD on (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Apology for Jesse Long
|
|
(...) Why argue any more online? Does any person on Lugnet even KNOW exactly what started this arguement? I think that constructive criticism (which I have been trying to do very strongly to most people online) should be allowed on Lugnet. I believe (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Apology for Jesse Long
|
|
(...) I decided to let that slide in the context it was said...but you are correct, Tom. <snip> (...) E-mail, too, has failed...sadly. I've been privvy to some of the mail, and it hasn't worked any better than words here. But Tom, this IS a public (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
