|
|
 | | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) I believe 'sodomite' is an accurate term, and the way I used it was not to bash anyone. You neglected to show the context in which I used that word in the first place, which was to show that by the term 'sodomite' one would know both 'sexual (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Hidden Mickeys...
|
| (...) Hi, let me be the first one to say welcome to Lugnet and to LGBT. Cool models, I never been in LEGOLAND California yet though but I was in Windsor and Gunzburg (didn't find any of those though). Yaron (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
| | | | | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) Agreed. It is also inaccurate in that (at least in my view, which may be flawed because I'm hetero) having a preference and acting on that preference are not at all the same thing. (and the distinction goes a lot deeper than that) However I (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) (URL) "Come on, before the modern term of 'homosexual' was coined into English, everyone knew what a sodomite was..." 'Sodomite', in case you didn't know, is considered offensive and an insult. Even if this term wasn't used against someone, it (...) (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
| | | | | Re: speaking of dead in the water...
|
| (...) Spoiler It's the bricks that got small. Sunset Boulevard? George (20 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
|
|
