 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| Bruce Schlickbernd wrote in message ... (...) Well, I wasn't going through the posts saying mentally "that one, and that one, and that one..." and categorising who was saying what, and how. No intentional lumping going on. (...) with (...) Many (...) (22 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) Clarification: ...the only time a thread has been cancelled without first securing the permission of the poster(s). -Tim (22 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.people, lugnet.org, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) Yep. We didn't even cancel the infamous f-bomb posts (which kinda surprised me). The only time a thread has been cancelled was at the request of LEGO's lawyers upon the leaking of some confidential information, some years ago. And IIRC, it (...) (22 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.people, lugnet.org, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Edward Welsh wrote: --snip-- (...) Well I'm not sure I think that's a good idea. Lugnet has managed to stay nicely free of censorship so far - it would be nice if that continued. However, of such posts would be good, and (...) (22 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.people, lugnet.org, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) Are you lumping into that those that are really saying, "Lugnet is about Lego, and homesexual, heterosexual, transsexual, etc. really has nothing to do with Lego"? I'm starting to see spin-mastering on this topic that I don't foresee as (...) (22 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.org)
|
|
