To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.parts.customOpen lugnet.parts.custom in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Parts / Custom / 6
5  |  7
Subject: 
Re: Idea for new train wheel
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.parts.custom
Date: 
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:14:20 GMT
Viewed: 
7565 times
  
In lugnet.parts.custom, Rob Hendrix wrote:
> > Do we need the whole wheel to be metal? Or would snap on tyres be sufficient?
> > What if you made metal flanged (and blind) tyres that snapped onto the current
> > BBB blind wheel? It would increase the size a bit, no doubt but might avoid the
> > expensive part of the tooling (the spokes and axle hub and stuff)
> > 
> > What arrangments owuld you make for power transfer? Wipers? Something that was a
> > pair of wipers at one end (that somehow fit into something LEGO) and a 2x2 wire
> > connector at the other end might be a good approach
> 
> My thinking was to use a technic beam as the support structure and have a
> small ball bearing (bee bee?) and spring in one of the technic holes behing
> the wheel.  That way, the ball bearing would make contact behind the wheel
> and the spring would ensure tension.  I could solder a wire to the spring
> and go from there to the motor.  Of course, all this is rough speculation...
> 
> But I'm thinking,
> Rob

A sufficiently thin wiper made of spring metal, vertically arranged, with a
horizontal tab with a suitable hole punched in it so that it would fit between
two plates to hold it in place, which then had a wire soldered to it leading off
to the side, might also work. This is the scheme used in many systems and gives
good contact performance. I think, since it's a sliding contact, it tends to
self clean.

But your arrangement might have less drag.

I wonder what the gearing needs to be to have a loco so powered (of reasonable
weight) have similar performance characteristics (speed vs. regulator setting)
as a conventional motor

I also wonder what the market size for this is?



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Idea for new train wheel
 
(...) sufficient? (...) current (...) avoid the (...) was a (...) wire (...) My thinking was to use a technic beam as the support structure and have a small ball bearing (bee bee?) and spring in one of the technic holes behing the wheel. That way, (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.parts.custom)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR