|
|
 | | Re: Wow!
|
| "John Barnes" <barnes@sensors.com> wrote in message news:I1wAnD.1HsF@lugnet.com... (...) I would imagine that you are going to fall more in the parts.custom and parts.mod category. Come on over, there's plenty of room!! Leave these purists to sit (...) (21 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts)
| | | | | Re: Wow!
|
| (...) Not here they'd better not be. You're thinking of parts.MOD.... :-) Questions suitable for here would be along the lines of "if LEGO could make just one new part next year, what would you choose?" (21 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts)
| | | | | Wow!
|
| They've made a special bat channel just for us! Hope the faint of heart purists don't browse these threads too often. There are all sorts of dastardly doings that are gonna get posted here. Mwuaahaaahaahaahaa (21 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts)
| | | | | Re: STL File for 3D Printing
|
| (...) Ah, oh well. Nice to e-meet you. (...) That's neat. I just spent a week at an RP conference, so the alphabet soup is still pretty fresh in my mind. I actually know what those acronyms stand for! (...) Oh, OK, you're doing it the "old fashioned (...) (21 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts, lugnet.parts.custom, FTX)
| | | | | Re: STL File for 3D Printing
|
| (...) Nope, that wasn't me. I'm a drafter (1). I haven't been to any brick cons yet, although I'm 95% sure I'll be at Brickfest in two weeks. But.. Hi yourself. (...) We have 2 FDM machines and 2 SLS ones. I'd have to go down there to get model (...) (21 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts, lugnet.parts.custom, FTX)
| | | | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) This thread has stuck in my mind for a while. First, a better link to the picture I meant to show in my original reply. (Bad form, I know... replying to my own post, but I'm fixing a poor FTX posting and adding new info... and using a new (...) (21 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Curator for lugnet.parts hierarchy
|
| Rob Hendrix has graciously agreed to assume curatorship of the lugnet.parts hierarchy. Please give him all the support he deserves(1), thanks. ++Lar 1 - i.e. "none"(2) 2 - "That's a joke, son" (21 years ago, 1-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts, lugnet.admin.curators)
| | | | | Re: First post?
|
| (...) Both styles have their advantages. In the two specific examples that you cited, the single-piece versions not only eliminate the seam you'd get when using the split parts side-by-side, but they're also hollow, allowing them to be secured by (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jul-04, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: First post?
|
| (...) That's EXACTLY what I mean, and thank you very much for illustrating it since I was too lazy/rushed to dig up images. (...) I guess regular and inverse are almost as much a pair as right and left side but not QUITE as much, so I guess I can (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jul-04, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: First post?
|
| (...) Ditto. (...) Do you mean that they've started releasing parts like these: (2 URLs) Rather than, or at least in addition to, a part like this: (URL) If that's what you mean, then I totally agree. I think it's great to see more of what I would (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jul-04, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
|
