 | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) This thread has stuck in my mind for a while. First, a better link to the picture I meant to show in my original reply. (Bad form, I know... replying to my own post, but I'm fixing a poor FTX posting and adding new info... and using a new (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Curator for lugnet.parts hierarchy
|
| Rob Hendrix has graciously agreed to assume curatorship of the lugnet.parts hierarchy. Please give him all the support he deserves(1), thanks. ++Lar 1 - i.e. "none"(2) 2 - "That's a joke, son" (22 years ago, 1-Aug-04, to lugnet.parts, lugnet.admin.curators)
| | | | | Re: Are custom made parts LEGO?
|
| (...) Hello Johannes, What follows are my opinions only... based on your questions. (...) I would respond, 'no' they're not. They would be construction parts compatible with the LEGO building system, but since they weren't actually made by LEGO, (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.parts.custom)
| | | | | Re: First post?
|
| (...) Both styles have their advantages. In the two specific examples that you cited, the single-piece versions not only eliminate the seam you'd get when using the split parts side-by-side, but they're also hollow, allowing them to be secured by (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-04, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: First post?
|
| (...) That's EXACTLY what I mean, and thank you very much for illustrating it since I was too lazy/rushed to dig up images. (...) I guess regular and inverse are almost as much a pair as right and left side but not QUITE as much, so I guess I can (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-04, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
|
