 | | Re: Age limitations - my two cents —Matthew Miller
| | | | (...) I'm not sure that's completely true -- Karen and I are both also 25. (...) People who take part but not much should have a voice. People who don't take part at all is different, don't you think? (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Age limitations - my two cents —Mike Zinkowsky
| | | | | (...) Ok..I'll apologize for this one, as I said, I haven't met anyone, and spoken with much of anyone, so am unsure of everyone's ages. (...) True enough, though I'm unsure about people like me, people in contact with the group, but not in (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Age limitations - my two cents —Jeff Johnston
| | | | | (...) That brings up an interesting point... Suppose there were a group of NELUGgers in, say, Hartford, CT. If all of them were comfortable with having a 15 year old member, or judging on a case-by-case basis, should the opinions of the core Boston (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Age limitations - my two cents —Frank Filz
| | | | | (...) take (...) the (...) case (...) groups (...) logical (...) Jumping in from outside again (please note - follow-ups to lugnet.org), please take the following as a suggestion (and other LUGs who are grappling with membership policies should also (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.org)
| | | | | | |
