Subject:
|
Re: Age limitations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.nelug
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Jul 2000 17:08:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5385 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.nelug, Richard W. Schamus writes:
> 5) The Question for LUGNET (err... n-o-t E-r-i-c) is, should age limitation be
> be a factor in local LUG membership.
>
> 6) Though you (E-r-i-c), may wish to keep pounding away at the rock so that it
> will just go away, you are not the author of the original post, so you are not
> the one to end the discussion.
Ah, I see. It's a simple misunderstanding.
I don't care if you discuss this all over Lugnet, by all means, Shiri asked you
to, go ahead.
But when you post things like this statement:
> The question remains. Why an age limit for those who have demonstrated
> maturity?
to lugnet.org.us.nelug (in http://www.lugnet.com/org/us/nelug/?n=677), with no
crossposting, it seems very much like what your after is a discussion from
NELUG about why the age limit is set *for NELUG*. Which is wh I kept telling
you our reason (we wanted it that way) and that we would discuss it at our next
meeting.
But you weren't being harassing, you were just posting sloppily. I see now.
Well, as I've said many times, feel free to discuss the pros and cons of age
limits in general. I am neither hurt nor angry about it (which you seem
determined to label me as being).
eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) because (...) I (...) a (...) This is all well and good. Your decicions, at your meet, at your club. I do not contridict myself. You keep asking to let it lie, (which you can ASK all you want,) but the ORIGINAL poster(Shiri) asked for a public (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
