To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.nelugOpen lugnet.org.us.nelug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / NELUG / 1796
1795  |  1797
Subject: 
Train Tables (FWD)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.nelug
Date: 
Wed, 18 Jul 2001 01:55:07 GMT
Viewed: 
961 times
  
Tom sent some info (his note, not really mine):

I'll try to clarify some things, as sprinkled below:

1st off, the tables were really lightweight. I forget how heavy our tables
> > are when fully assembled, but I could lift up a WAMALUG table with one hand
> > without much trouble-- it also had a center support beam running underneath
> > the top for easier 1-handed carrying.

The support beam is really a stiffener for the plywood, so it doesn't sag.  It's just dumb luck that it doubles as a
handle.

I actually don't think of them as light, but i'm a wuss - and it scares
me that your tables are heavier!  Tom could tell you what width wood and
such he used.


The tables are framed with 1x3 lumber (3/4"x2 1/2") with 3/8" plywood on for the tops.  I used 2x2 (1 1/2"x1 1/2") legs
with commercial folding leg brackets.  Hinges (cut piano hinges) and plywood (scrap from making the tops) are used to
make the triangular braces for the legs.

> > As for disadvantages-- when talking to them, they said there were two things
> > they would change: the height and the width. I think our tables are
> > significantly shorter, but theirs were something like 3 feet high? I dunno.
> > But it was such that little kids couldn't see over the top as they said.

Yes, they are 36" high.  I personally like them that high.

(jenn's note: tom also has an ho layout at his house that's shoulder
height to me!!!)

The 2nd thing they said they wanted to change was to make it a 3x3 baseplate
dimention, rather than a 4x4, seeing as they had some problems reaching the
middle with some of the larger buildings. I don't think we've really had
this issue in the past-- but the other advantage they said it would have
would be that they could fit in any-old-car, not just a van/SUV. Of course,
neither of these have been problems for us yet, seeing as we don't have HUGE
buildings, and the tables have always found a home in Eric's car which can
easily fit the tables...

Just remember that if the tables were 3x3 baseplates, the 36" legs would not fit inside!  The legs would have to be less
than 30", unless you made them fold diagonally and overlap them, like a bridge table.



1 Message in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR