| |
XFUT to trains.org...
I can testify to the strength of these tables. They're size compatible with
other 30x30 and 30x60 tables but a lot stronger (and heavier...)... We have
used these in several shows now and are getting faster and faster at
setup/takedown.
In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Jason Spears writes:
> If you have ever wanted to build modular tables capable of supporting a
> member of your club(1) or even the heavest layout, look no futher.
> MichLUG's table specs are now live. Much thanks to Steve Ringe, would did
> the design work on these and completed the drawings.
>
> Link is on the front page as usual.
> http://www.michlug.org/
>
> -Jason
>
> (1) http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/srezkall/GATS2002GR/3.jpg
>
> +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
> Jason Spears
> MichLUG - http://www.michlug.org/
> Lego Page - http://www.ozbricks.com/brickcentral/
> +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: MichLUG Table Specs
|
| The designs look good. Why did you feel the need to make them heavier than previously designed tables? Have you experience an issue with tables not holding up to the weight of the layout? We have actually been trying to make our tables even lighter (...) (22 years ago, 25-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | MichLUG Table Specs
|
| If you have ever wanted to build modular tables capable of supporting a member of your club(1) or even the heavest layout, look no futher. MichLUG's table specs are now live. Much thanks to Steve Ringe, would did the design work on these and (...) (22 years ago, 25-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.us.michlug) !
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
