Subject:
|
Re: Mackinac Island - Tony's Thoughts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.michlug
|
Date:
|
Sat, 28 Jul 2001 02:58:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
467 times
|
| |
|
|
> Tony is having uploading problems, so I posted a picture for him. It is here:
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=59114
I think in some ways this is dead-on. The space for the hotel might be a
little small, but other than that there's enough space there to suggest
Mackinac--and that's all we can do, suggest. Several shops, maybe a B&B,
and we're there. Amy's right though--it's too deep to work well on. Could
we instead have a "spur" off our main tables and put it on that, just the
island and maybe a little water? It would mean no railroad running by it
though--and would make the bridge kind of pointless.
Anywho, I'm sure the idea will get a lot more revision in the next five
months, particularly as we see what everybody has. I agree with Larry on
having at least one ferry slip. Scott's idea about forgoing tables for
water--what if we build the tables to leave a U, and have a couple tables in
the center of the U, with enough space so people can walk between the
mainland and the island?
Peter
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Mackinac Island - Tony's Thoughts
|
| (...) One ferry slip has the advantage of allowing the ferry to be pretty large. Large enough to support some complex switching, etc. That's attractive! (I know how this club feels about large things. :-) ) Two ferry slips requires a much smaller (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
