 | | Re: MichLUG Items in Debate not Appropriate
|
| To All, Well, since I am a laughing stock to the community now, I guess I will respond. (...) Because it was a MichLUG item, that's why, and it got dragged here. < Snipped rest of post > yes, I see. Well, after talking with Larry, and seeing some of (...) (26 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| | | | | Re: Question concerning Upcoming event
|
| To Larry & All, (...) a (...) Welcome to the group, or club, as it were. I was annoyed since Friday. (...) Indeed, I forgot about that, and I apologize for doing so. (...) I don't feel it was debatable, but I digress to, in terms of dropping it. (...) (26 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| | | | | Re: MichLUG Items in Debate not Appropriate
|
| (...) Then why reply to them? (...) -no, what I am _not_ in favor of is having a non religious group become religious because of a minority opinion. I said, (...) (from .debate 10087) (...) What I wrote (I'm not sure you read it was: (...) -please (...) (26 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| | | | | Re: Question concerning Upcoming event
|
| The meat of the question is NOT as Scott states it. I am beginning to get a bit annoyed by this. A good resolution has already been reached, one that most of the membership that spoke up seemed quite satisfied with. Why it is being reopened is (...) (26 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| | | | | Space Stuff for upcoming events WAS: [Re: A Lego display fund raiser]
|
| Trevor & All, (...) Probably. Oh no, I see my name next! (...) Dat? I need to do it in MLCad? : 0 (...) Well, my town, but all of my space stuff is available. Most people don't want to see the TDF-1st Fleet's Planetary Operations Division rolling (...) (26 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
|
