 | | Re: Mountain Layout
|
| Now that you've got most of the issues out of the way, I'll reply. :) In lugnet.org.us.michlug, Jason Spears wrote: [snip] (...) If you run low on building materials, making a "paper holder" is a good excuse for not having a finished top. ;) (...) (25 years ago, 28-Aug-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| | | | | Re: Mountain Layout
|
| (...) Well maybe I can answer a few of those questions. (...) One running through, and another along the outside. Perhaps some elevation, with a bridge over the river kwai. This mountain could be the source of water for a lake/bay in another part of (...) (25 years ago, 28-Aug-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| | | | | Re: Mountain Layout
|
| (...) That's al right. I wasn't mad, just wanting to clarify. I appreciate your feedback. -Jason (25 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| | | | | Re: Mountain Layout
|
| Jason, (...) Ugh, that sounds really bad. A day of meetings, ugh. My apologies. (...) Indeed. You might be able just to start a traight one, and see if it goes into a corner perhaps. (...) Oh, I see. Cool. 165 burps? Wow! (...) I think that is a (...) (25 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| | | | | Re: Mountain Layout
|
| (...) This is not a bad approach, actually. If you're soliciting suggestions I vote for straight, one track exposed, one hidden, with the exposed track on the GP side. If it also had a bit of elevation that would be cool too! Hey, maybe even a (...) (25 years ago, 27-Aug-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
|
