 | | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
(...) I'm in agreement with you here--though I think Chris and Amy have some terrific large buildings that should definitely be part of the display. (...) I also agree with you that we shouldn't spend space on stock TLC buildings--maybe a couple (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
(...) I understand and accept that viewpoint but I guess my goal is a little different in that I want to have the best display possible, one that wows the crowd, not necessarily one that includes only work of members, or one that is geared to be as (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: plywood
|
|
(...) I agree. Just having baseplates affixed to plywood modular tables doesn't save much time at all. However (and let me be clear that I'm not advocating that we switch to the GMLTC modular system, not by any means at all) that's not what GMLTC (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: plywood
|
|
(...) Hey it was only an hour late<grin> This time so i don't do that again I am sending a final copy of the layout to Scott, Amy etc. so that everyone has his own copy(That way i can't leave it at home again) (...) Peter that sounds pretty good.I (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
(...) My point when we discussed it was that first and foremost, we do this for fun. We do it because we love building with LEGO. For that reason, our priority should be to give space to our members to display their own handiwork. If we've got stuff (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
