 | | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
|
(...) Sorry I missed it. I have been working up the (small) space allotted to me to make a good looking display without regard to where the buildings came from. I think that's more important (to have it look cohesive and look like the buildings (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
|
(...) I have made a missle like that if u need it (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
|
Peter, (...) Well, it might be nice, but impractical. It just boils down to most people do not have that big of collection. Chris and Steve are making most of the display anyway, and the implications of trying to get that kind of things done before (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
|
(...) I think the wharf could be done pretty well with the ramp and elevated train platform pieces. It would definitely be lower than your sub, though. In any case, spacewise I don't think we can consider it, from what I've seen of the layout. The (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
|
(...) I *STILL* say we should do that... divide up the layout into different "neighborhoods," and each person is responsible for one or more neighborhoods. For the buildings, that it--lay the track down after. All we'd need is plywood with the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
