To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.lucnyOpen lugnet.org.us.lucny in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / L.U.C.N.Y. / 264
263  |  265
Subject: 
Re: Improved Train models
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.lucny
Date: 
Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:50:53 GMT
Viewed: 
3669 times
  
In lugnet.org.us.lucny, Kevin Salm writes:
> Sometimes a little gentle nudging and encouragement by others is all it
> takes to spur greater creativity.  I have found this to be true for me
> since last weekend's meeting.


*snippage*

> 
> This will allow the following consist for my Blue Metroliner:
> 1 high-speed diesel/electric locomotive
> 1 B-unit locomotive
> 1 Baggage Car (with Type II sliding doors)
> 1 Employee sleeper/lounge Car
> 1 Dining Car with kitchen
> 2 Observation and Bar Cars (Club Cars)
> 2 Coach-Class passenger Cars (upright seating only)
> 2 First Class passenger cars (various configurations)
> 2 Roomette sleeper cars
> 
> 

Wow - sounds like a large consist that would look excellent on a large
enough layout.  I look forward to seeing it, of course.

> As for freight stock--all the boxcars that were at the Cortland meeting
> were deemed too tall and caused constant derailment.  Each of these have
> now been reconfigured with lower overall height and the shorter waggons
> have all been increased to a minimum of 24 studs in length.


Ahh - much better.

> With the aforementioned changes in place, all units were tested on live
> track with some complex curves.  Almost all performance issues
> have been eliminated at this point; the biggest issue is now magnetic
> coupler failure.  In short, even at full speed, the cars no longer fall
> off the tracks but weight and rolling resistantance sometimes cause a
> train to become uncoupled at high speeds.

No problem.  All our trains can be derailed at some speed or combination,
i'd guess.

> 
> Believe it or not, I have more Train creations that I did NOT bring to
> the meeting.  Since I am highly motivated this week, I will make any
> needed modifications to these models soon.  Mostly, I have to figure out
> how to make my locomotives heavier.  And I have plans in my head for
> building even more locomotives and rolling stock depending on parts
> availability.  A Black F-7 diesel locomotive is on my list of things
> to build as are B-unit locomotives and a full compliment of passenger
> coaches for a Super Chief.
> 
> Geez, we need to have another meeting soon.  I already have a bunch of
> stuff to show off and will have even more as time goes on.
> If I didn't live so far from everyone else, I would offer to host a meeting
> at my church--the basement has easily twice as much open floor space as
> the church in Cortland and is carpeted.  But the only member who is near
> me is Nate Jacobs and that is only when he is not away at college.
> Anway, my calendar is wide open.  So if anyone wants to suggest another
> meeting or another possible venue you can put me on the list for attending.


Your location is just as far as Cortland was for me, so I'm up for it.

> :: Apologies for such a long-winded post ::
> 
> 
> __Kevin Salm__
> ....Over 20 years experience playing with Lego toys....



Message is in Reply To:
  Improved Train models
 
Sometimes a little gentle nudging and encouragement by others is all it takes to spur greater creativity. I have found this to be true for me since last weekend's meeting. I have been accumulating Lego parts to build trains for several years, but (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.lucny)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR