Subject:
|
Re: third generation rock crawler
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Jan 2007 19:36:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2320 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, John Brost wrote:
> Well look whose back to being able to post on LUGNET :)
I've now found that as long as I go to my junk mail folder, I can usually find
the "authorize post" email. Weird, about 1 time in 5 it gets into my normal
inbox, and the rest of the time it ends up sorted into "junk".
> As to rotating the motor, that would require either
> elongating the wheelbase, or raising the NXT up to
> make room. Neither option is desirable.
Yeah, I can see that. In answer to Steve's post about mine, well... now that
I've licked the LUGNET issue, maybe actual build-time is next :-). I'm thinking
about variable geometry and unsprung suspension.
For review, where's the limitations list? Are we at one NXT kit for the vehicle,
plus any other non-electronic parts? I'm thinking specificly about if there's a
three motor limit or not.
--
Brian Davis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: third generation rock crawler
|
| (...) At this point, there really aren't limits on LEGO parts. Bryan hasn't posted (publicly) about his robot, but I think he's using the controller from the RC buggy for his, along with four motors. Both John and I have robots that look very much (...) (17 years ago, 8-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: third generation rock crawler
|
| (...) Well look whose back to being able to post on LUGNET :) As to rotating the motor, that would require either elongating the wheelbase, or raising the NXT up to make room. Neither option is desirable. Raising the NXT puts the COG too high, and (...) (17 years ago, 8-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
