Subject:
|
Re: Over-the-train GBC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 18:35:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1164 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
Although even there there’s some interesting room to wiggle. For instance,
given that gravity-feed ramps will almost certainly work to shift balls
perpendicular from the track during a crossing, it should be possible to make
two “U” modules that either feed each other (performing an S+Z option) or feed
away from each other (making, perhaps, a double crossing as it were).
On a more practical note, what are the constraints provided by the IndyLUG
setup in October? Where will the track enter the GBC section, for instance...
and at what height? You mention:
|
Brian,
I put this in my Brickshelf account, it’s a large file, but should help you to
understand the designated area.
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/beatnik/OctoberGTX2005/octgtx_.jpg
Jeramy
-IndyLUG-
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Over-the-train GBC
|
| (...) I'm still trying to think up a good one - in other words, one that really looks like it "belongs" in a train layout. (...) First, are we limiting to a Type 1b as we called it, i.e. - a Type 1b module occupies a 32x32 baseplate, not more? What (...) (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
