Subject:
|
Re: Over-the-train GBC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 18:25:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
571 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, September 7, 2005 12:09 pm, Brian Davis wrote:
> In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> > I don't think it's going to work... not really
> > accounted for in the GBC Standard is the width
> > of the train track.
>
> Another good point, and one that should probably be addressed first. One
> possibility is to (further!) limit modules to 32x24 studs, with a seperate 32x8
> decorative strip that can be used if need.
This won't work with current train loading & unloading stations. The current
stations have the front of the track 32 studs from the front of the module output
(or input).
> On a more practical note, what are the constraints provided by the IndyLUG
> setup in October? Where will the track enter the GBC section, for instance...
Here's a small picture from the layout.
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Hassenplug/GBC/gbcarea.jpg
Area "F" is the current GBC. It's shown as 2x6 (baseplates). That includes the
train having 8 studs on the plate behind the GBC.
For this show, I may just mess around with having a module that's 32 studs wide, and
64 studs deep, with a train in the middle (32 in front of the train, 24 behind it).
I'm open to other ideas on how to incorporate a GBC into a train layout...
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Over-the-train GBC
|
| (...) I'm still trying to think up a good one - in other words, one that really looks like it "belongs" in a train layout. (...) First, are we limiting to a Type 1b as we called it, i.e. - a Type 1b module occupies a 32x32 baseplate, not more? What (...) (19 years ago, 7-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
