 | | Re: Tic-Tac-Toe-bot
|
|
(...) What about Othello? That requires the robot to be able to place AND reverse the pieces. Not sure if 8x8 would produce very interesting matches, maybe a smaller board? Even 4x4 may produce interesting strategies... ROSCO (19 years ago, 29-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: Tic-Tac-Toe-bot
|
|
(...) This would be a timed game. The winner would be the robot with the lowest average time-per-move. Actually, I was just thinking about it. Even that may not be a good comparison. I think robots should play each other twice, with each going first (...) (19 years ago, 29-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Schedule of events
|
|
I usually have several things in the planning stage. Here's what I have coming up in the next few months, and the robots I'll be taking: Oct 15-16 GTX train show with IndyLUG in Indy A small GBC Nov 13th - Chibots fall contest (www.chibots.org) A (...) (19 years ago, 29-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: Line Following Monster
|
|
(...) I have a Nitro Menace ((URL) that I bought because I want to turn it into something. I've been thinking about an RC car, but a line follower would be cool. I don't think it would be super-fast, and I'm not sure it would fit the Chibots rules, (...) (19 years ago, 29-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: Line Following Monster
|
|
(...) Correction - the rest of the gearing is 1:3 (I forgot about an 8:24 connection in the drive train)...though it could easily be changed to 1:1 with a couple of 16 tooth gears. :) (19 years ago, 29-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc, FTX)
|
