Subject:
|
Re: Motorized Point
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.indylug
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Dec 2002 20:33:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
495 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Brian B. Alano wrote:
> The completely redesigned version has been posted at
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=29464
> and should be available soon.
Nifty. This looks like pretty optimal in terms of horizontal space. Can
the design be easily adapted to a lower profile (motor beside the
mechanism) when horizontal space is plentiful? Putting the motor beneath
the mechanism looks okay (I think?), which is probably the most
aesthetically pleasing way to do this for an elevated point.
--
TWS Garrison
http://www.math.purdue.edu/~tgarriso/
Remove capital letters in address for direct reply.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Motorized Point
|
| (...) Yes, the motor can be above (as shown), below, or behind (further from the track) the drive train without significant design change or increase in volume. You can easily put it to the left or right of the drive train, but that's harder to (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.us.indylug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
