To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.gmlugOpen lugnet.org.us.gmlug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / GMLUG / 23
22  |  24
Subject: 
Re: Pantograph powered LEGO trains?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.org.us.gmlug, lugnet.trains.org
Date: 
Thu, 27 Jan 2000 02:54:46 GMT
Viewed: 
16 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <388F7AF0.1EBAEF5C@voyager.net>...
Mike Poindexter wrote:

Brian proves that 6 wide IS viable.


Sure, if you don't mind using paint and stickers for detailing, which I • was
led to believe that you do mind.  <gd&r>

hehe. Mike tries to hoist me by my own petard but I'm slipperier than
that.

I'll merely allege that his models would look just fine to me even
without the paint and stickers. That he chooses to augment them is
merely his own personal demon. :-)

That was easy. Suspiciously easy. What trap have I fallen into? :-)


Well, after dealing with lugnet.off-topic.debate, anything else would seem
easy. Sheesh. At least here we're talking real existing things, not
scenarios someone has cooked up to break your theory.

Frank



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Pantograph powered LEGO trains?
 
(...) hehe. Mike tries to hoist me by my own petard but I'm slipperier than that. I'll merely allege that his models would look just fine to me even without the paint and stickers. That he chooses to augment them is merely his own personal demon. (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.org.us.gmlug, lugnet.trains.org)

22 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR