 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| "Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote: <chop an excellent disertation> (...) ...When we (WAMALUG) were making up our Charter, we wrestled with the jrfol issue some too. Some of us, myself included, wanted to be part of the club mostly to be (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.org.us.nclug)
| | | | | Re: Age limitations
|
| FUT lugnet.org (...) Well I don't know about the other "True" LUGs but I don't think being a LUG as opposed to an LTC had anything to do with it. I think it mostly came down to the demographics of our group at the begining. Like Todd pointed out I (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nclug, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) This sounds like a good policy to me. The idea of a sponsor allows a junior member to attend if they are able to convince at least one person to give them a chance (and contribute sufficiently to the activities that the rest of the members (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nclug)
| | | | | Re: Age limitations
|
| "Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:Fx5tJo.F84@lugnet.com... [... snipped ... ] (...) so (...) I just returned from my parents house (Northern Virginia - I did make it to the LEGO Outlet, you just gotta like the scratch and (...) (26 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.org.us.nclug)
| | | | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) And 'chuh.org' isn't immediately recognizable as a high school - if it was chuh.k12.oh.us or something then the 'Student' URL would be a giveaway... (...) How were they? I'd have been there but I knew it would have been a transportation (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us)
|
|
