To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.usOpen lugnet.org.us in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / 556
555  |  557
Subject: 
Re: Age limitations
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug
Date: 
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 17:10:18 GMT
Viewed: 
2054 times
  
In lugnet.org.us, Richard Franks writes:

She raised the issue of membership, that is a positive step.

It would have been far more positive if she had contacted NELUG directly,
rather than attempting to "shame" us into changing our policies by bringing it
up with a wide crosspost on Lugnet.  We are not hard people to get ahold of.
Our webpage has contact info (he said without looking to be sure it was true)
and, barring that, Lugnet thoughtfully provides every poster's email address.

In which the issue is addressed addressed maturely. Please try to refrain from
making personal comments as that does nothing to further the debate,
especially
when they appear to be unfounded. It seems most likely to generate more trolls
given the circumstances :(

It was neither unfounded nor untopical.

It is founded (ie backed up) by the post she made- the way she thought it was
appropriate to begin the discussion.

It is topical because it is exactly the core of the discussion- that, IMHO,
NELUG was started as a group for ADULTS.  I am interested in this aspect
SPECIFICALLY to avoid things like this.

eric



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Age limitations
 
(...) If the original post was only sent to lugnet.org.us.nelug group then would that have been acceptable? (...) You misread -- I never mentioned the topicity of the subject. (...) That's *your* read. As a discussion group, I think it's entirely (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
  Re: Age limitations
 
(...) I honestly get the impression that this is what is really at the core of the desires of the folks who agree with the age restriction. "We are a bunch of adults who all share an interest in LEGO, and we want to do activities that adults do (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Age limitations
 
(...) She raised the issue of membership, that is a positive step. The fact that a lot of cause-fighters weighed in, happy to battle should not, IMHO be in any way the responsibility of the original poster. (...) I believe that argument is nullified (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)

258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR