To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.usOpen lugnet.org.us in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / 553
552  |  554
Subject: 
Re: Age limitations
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug
Followup-To: 
lugnet.org.us.nelug
Date: 
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 16:56:07 GMT
Viewed: 
2189 times
  
In lugnet.org.us, Matthew Miller writes:
[...]
To re-iterate yet again: it is important to us to be a group of adult Lego
fans -- that what makes it fun to us. (Lego would be fun no matter what, of
course. But it is part of the _particular_ fun of this group. [1] ) Exactly
what makes an adult is a difficult question (and as I also mentioned
earlier, we considered 21) and we decided on 18 as a natural limit given the
legal implications.

I disagree with the first statement there -- I think everyone (myself included)
is getting tripped up over the word "adult."  Do you really mean to say that
it is important to us (NELUG) to be a group of 18-and-older LEGO fans?  I think
what's important to us (NELUG) is to be a group of "adult-acting" LEGO fans.

What is "adult-acting"?  By that I mean acting like an adult and not like a
child or mid-range teenager (19-year-old's are adults but still technically
teenagers).

Who cares is someone is 16 if they act mature enough to be twice that age?
I thought the group was about sharing ideas and experiences from an adult
viewpoint -- and that really has more to do with a state of mind than a
physical age.

I agree it's hard (nay, impossible) to define what "adult" means if it doesn't
simply mean "18 or older," but I submit that the average LEGO fan in the age
range 16-18 is more adult than the average non-LEGO fan in the same age range.

--Todd

[followups to .org.us.nelug]



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Age limitations
 
(...) That's definitely important. But it actually _is_ important to some members (not unshakeably strongly for me, but maybe for some people, and I think it's a completely valid viewpointpoint) that it be an _adult_ group. After all, this is a (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Age limitations
 
(...) You could. But 18 is the age where, in the United States, you are legally responsible for yourself. (The age of majority.) Many members of NELUG are concerned about the possible legal implications of accepting minors into our group. You mocked (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)

258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR