To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.usOpen lugnet.org.us in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / 478
477  |  479
Subject: 
Re: Age limitations
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug
Date: 
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 05:32:24 GMT
Viewed: 
2083 times
  
In lugnet.org.us, Frank Filz writes:
In lugnet.org.us, Matthew Miller writes:
Peter White <aztekium@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
Hey Frank, why don't we all join NELUG (no geographical restrictions) and
vote down their restrictive rule (betcha they would find a way to stop us).

Do you really think attempting destructive action will help anybody? I don't
think Shiri would exactly feel welcomed into this group if this were the way
it happened.

We're not a government. Voting isn't a binding sort of legal thing. It's the
*agreement* that is critical.

I have to agree with Mathew on that one, and because of that we also need to
be carefull about how much we antagonize the current members. What I hope to
accomplish by participating in this debate is any of the following:

- convince NELUG to change its ways

- convince other groups to NOT adopt such a restrictive policy

- convince a group of people to start a new group in at least the Boston area
with a less restrictive policy

My aims too, Frank.
By pointing out how you can be more ridiculous than the ridiculous shows that
their position can be dismantled.
They need to rename the group to include Adult in the title.
Bad luck that Shiri doesn't live in a more equitable part of the US.

pete.w



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Age limitations
 
(...) No it doesn't. You acknowledged that they could find a way to stop you. What it does is show that you are not seeking a consensus. That what you want is to belittle, demean, and bend people to your will. I suspect quite sincerely, that you are (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Age limitations
 
(...) I have to agree with Mathew on that one, and because of that we also need to be carefull about how much we antagonize the current members. What I hope to accomplish by participating in this debate is any of the following: - convince NELUG to (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)

258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR