Subject:
|
Re: Age limitations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Jul 2000 02:13:09 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.orgSPAMLESS
|
Viewed:
|
1662 times
|
| |
|
|
Xcalabur <Xcalabur@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> What is "cool" and "not cool" has nothing to do with it. And, as I said
I didn't say "*what* is cool". I said "*who* is cool". That's a completely
separate issue. The actual words used may be "mature enough", but it won't
feel that way to the recipient of a rejection. It's painful enough for Shiri
to be rejected on what seems to her to be arbitrary grounds; how much more
painful would it be if we (or the community as a whole) handed down a "this
person isn't fit to be one of us"?
> before, just being a third party, I feel that this is VERY arrogant on NELUG's
> part as a whole...I think we'd all be satisfied if this were taken case by
> case; have a member vote. Is the person mature enough to be in NELUG? And,
We had a member vote. It was unanimous that we would draw the line at 18.
I'm glad for Shiri that so many people are willing to stick up for her, but
I am also amazed by the number of people who have no direct connection with
NELUG who are so willing to attack us. THAT strikes me as arrogant. If it
were just messags of support for Shiri, that would be one thing, but the
recent few messages (including but certainly not limited to yours) have been
very attacking, and I'm not sure how that is supposed to help anyone.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) OK, so replace "what" with "who". I still don't think that changes anything. (...) NELUG's (...) I apologize that I seemed arrogant. This is not so much an attack, and I'm sorry it came off that way. But it IS a very direct and straightforward (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) NELUG's (...) That was then, this is now. Though I'm not denying your unanimous vote, but if the rest of NELUG still feels the same on the issue, I'd sure like to see their support for you now. You appear to be the _only_ one sticking up for (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) NELUG's (...) Perhaps it is arrogant for outsiders to suggest a change (however, I would also point out that I actually have a minor vested interest in that I have family in the area, so would consider becoming a member of NELUG, and I have a (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) Now, you're bringing in an even more ludicrous argument, 'we','community', 'fit'. (...) NELUG's (...) So who put it forward ? (...) You mean attack a ridiculous reason for exclusion. If anyone thinks they can form an organisation with (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) What is "cool" and "not cool" has nothing to do with it. And, as I said before, just being a third party, I feel that this is VERY arrogant on NELUG's part as a whole...I think we'd all be satisfied if this were taken case by case; have a (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
