| |
In lugnet.org.us, Matthew Miller writes:
> In defense of the limit: there is another factor beyond what you listed. The
> liability issue provides a reason to make the line at exactly 18 (although
> we actually talked about making it 21). The "babysitting" concern wouldn't
> apply in your case, but there are people exactly your age to whom it *would*
> apply, and rather than having to tell those people so, it's a lot easier on
> us all to have a solid rule without exceptions.
Liability ? You worried about some homeboys carjacking the Town cars ?
What responsible parent would want you guys "babysitting" anyone ?
> But beyond all that: what makes NELUG special to many of us is that it is a
> group designed exactly for grown-up Lego enthusiasts. As the joke goes, it's
> a support group. Even though it might seem unfair to someone who is
> basically mature but technically under the line, the limit is an important
> defining factor of what NELUG is.
'Technically' means 'we aren't the one's discriminating', 'it's in the rules'.
If it's an Adult-only group it should be NEALUG maybe.
> Although not everyone might be so bold to come out and say it like this
> here, this *is* a general feeling of the NELUG membership.
Let's get all warm and fuzzy.
Out of interest does NELUG have any African-American members or disabled
members (and I don't just mean the socially inept).
>
> (This is what makes NELUG very different from the computer club story
> someone posted.)
The computer club story was an apt example for this debate.
> I know another trite little analogy isn't going to help much, but I'll say
> it anyway: when I was in Jr. High, all of my friends were in the High School
> age youth group at church. I felt really left out and jealous. I wasn't
> allowed, of course. My friends didn't like me any less, and still hung out
> with me otherwise. It just wasn't a place designed for me. And (here's the
> little moral of the story) when I actually was old enough, I appreciated
> that there was a High School group distinct from the Jr. High. It wasn't
> that the division made me feel superior to the younger kids; rather, it felt
> good to be included where I belonged. It can be a rite-of-passage thing. :)
Trite it is.
Christians or the people that label themselves as such are often experts at
discrimination.
>
> I really don't mean to be harsh, and you seemed like a very cool person when
> I met you. I definitely look forward to having you in the group in a few
> years.
A smug disclaimer to finish off with.
pete.w <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Age limitations
|
| In defense of the limit: there is another factor beyond what you listed. The liability issue provides a reason to make the line at exactly 18 (although we actually talked about making it 21). The "babysitting" concern wouldn't apply in your case, (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
258 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
