 | | Re: tic-tac-toe bots
|
| Kerby accidentally sent this to me... On Thu, November 3, 2005 4:07 pm, Kerby Hughes wrote: I kind of have mixed views about this. (Keep in mind that I haven't actually tried to build anything for 3T yet) If I was trying to build a robot that could (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| | | | | Re: tic-tac-toe bots
|
| (...) To address the first point, take a look at the large number of solutions to the "Project X" challeng in the rtlToronto newsgroup. One of the first things I built as a new Mindstorms user was a Project X 'bot, *because* I was curious how to do (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| | | | | Re: tic-tac-toe bots
|
| (...) Actually, planning for future events (like 3T) is also good. So, thanks. (...) ... (...) Why does it need to be limited to a single RCX? Of all the people who are likely to participate, can you think of any that are limited to one RCX? Also, (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| | | | | tic-tac-toe bots
|
| I know alot of you guys are focusing on Chibots right now but... So I actually felt like building last night and was thinking of tic-tac-toe. We had talked about awarding a time bonus to robots who could clear the board of their blocks after a game. (...) (21 years ago, 3-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| | | | | Re: lots of stuff...
|
| (...) Kevin, If you can regulate when the balls come through the machine, something like this would be very fun to watch. The cool part is making it "look" like it could fail at any time, but making it so it actually won't fail... At BrickFest, (...) (21 years ago, 2-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
|
