 | | Re: scibrick and our future
|
|
(...) snip (...) I have made my own ST mocs: (URL) I was just trying to throw out a fun suggestion. sorry to seem too serious. (URL) Jeff (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: scibrick and our future
|
|
(...) hee! great tribble. i looked at your post once, came back & looked again, but it hadn't multiplied yet :) Jeff (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: scibrick and our future
|
|
(...) I agree. My attitude is usually "What's stopping anyone from making their own (fill in the blank)?" I want the freedom to create what I think of, not necessarily what's in the instruction book. (...) I'm thinking along that line. (...) I would (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: scibrick and our future
|
|
(...) Why should Lego license? It only adds to the pricetag of sets--which people complain are too high. Look at the Make and Create. Do you want more parts for the price, or do you want to pay for a license every time you buy a set? Besides, with (...) (21 years ago, 11-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: scibrick and our future (long)
|
|
Felix, Scibrick, I feel, should be a group devoted to furthering the use of LEGO as an artistic media in the science-fiction genre. A very 'fluffy' sentence, so I'll explain: SB should be an independent group that is capable of presenting displays (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
|
