|
|
 | | Re: scibrick and our future
|
| (...) hee! great tribble. i looked at your post once, came back & looked again, but it hadn't multiplied yet :) Jeff (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
| | | | | Re: scibrick and our future
|
| (...) I agree. My attitude is usually "What's stopping anyone from making their own (fill in the blank)?" I want the freedom to create what I think of, not necessarily what's in the instruction book. (...) I'm thinking along that line. (...) I would (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
| | | | | Re: scibrick and our future
|
| (...) Why should Lego license? It only adds to the pricetag of sets--which people complain are too high. Look at the Make and Create. Do you want more parts for the price, or do you want to pay for a license every time you buy a set? Besides, with (...) (21 years ago, 11-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
| | | | | Re: scibrick and our future (long)
|
| Felix, Scibrick, I feel, should be a group devoted to furthering the use of LEGO as an artistic media in the science-fiction genre. A very 'fluffy' sentence, so I'll explain: SB should be an independent group that is capable of presenting displays (...) (21 years ago, 12-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
| | | | | Re: scibrick and our future
|
| (...) Jeff, Representatives from the LEGO company have made it pretty clear at Brickfest (and directly to me in the past) that they do not accept product suggestions from outside the company. Also, a Japanese company called Kubricks currently holds (...) (21 years ago, 11-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
|
|
