 | | Re: Reasons for Keeping the VLC's location to Members only —Mark Tarrabain
|
| | | (...) "do the members want..."? I have only one word to say: "Exlusivity". I have no interest in seeing the personal safety of an individual jeapordized, but I would have to wonder if it's in the best interests for a person so endangered to be (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.ca.vlc)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Reasons for Keeping the VLC's location to Members only —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | (...) Hey Mark, shut up, will ya? You're really starting to annoy me, and I don't even live in Vancouver. You're treating a Lego club like there's some innate human right to be a member of it, and that everyone is invited by virtue of knowing of a (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.ca.vlc, lugnet.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Reasons for Keeping the VLC's location to Members only —Dean Husby
|
| | | | (...) Yes, as was discussed during the first meeting that we wanted the members to agree to the rules which the members created. We only have a few rules. Every one present agreed to them. The VLC is a democracy. The Co-founders do not OWN the VLC. (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.ca.vlc)
|
| | | | |
