 | | Re: Standardizing Car Designs, etc.
|
|
"Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:GCovDK.4sv@lugnet.com... (...) Ideally, yes. And it'd be nice to have them on the ends, too. Right now, I can't really locate lengthwise along the train. +--+ | | | | +--+ is a container (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Standardizing Car Designs, etc.
|
|
(...) There isn't enough length on that platform for the cones on the end...the end platforms are only 6 wide by 8 long, exactly the length of a container. But you will have alignment marks on the side of the flatcar to optically align yourself (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Standardizing Car Designs, etc.
|
|
"Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:GCpnKK.AMG@lugnet.com... (...) container. (...) Ew, are you still using those dual-height things? Crap... :-/ Really wish you'd just keep the level the same... Iain (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Standardizing Car Designs, etc.
|
|
(...) Unfortunately it's harder to make-I don't have any of those train wagon plates. I only have the lowered well cars in any quantity. Calum (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Standardizing Car Designs, etc.
|
|
Me! Me! I can make a few. Jeff (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
