 | | Re: The portlands below altenburg —Calum Tsang
| | | | (...) So, I wanted to mention this at dinner, but didn't get around to it, and all of a sudden, only Technic people were left... :) The layout is getting too large. We need to cut it down in size quick, or we'll have a lot of unused space which (...) (22 years ago, 12-Oct-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The portlands below altenburg —Jeff Elliott
| | | | | | (...) Well, the way I see it is like this: We spent a lot of time wrangling with the track geometry, and the original "core" layout is as small as we can get, and still have the features we wanted, ie: two track levels, a perpendicular 2-level (...) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The portlands below altenburg —Chris Magno
| | | | | | | (...) as i have already quite publicly stated (in front of official people from a certain toy manufacture) Bruce and I will be building a CRACK house and motel.... NOT a biker house... geesh. and besides... i'm way to busy trying to figure out if i (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The portlands below altenburg —Martin Legault
| | | | | (...) hey, we're already star, were's my limo ;-) Calum is rigth here, the important is not the size but quality of the layout. Anybody with a bunch of peace can do a layout in no time, no effort,... But to do a realy good one is a lot more (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | |
