Subject:
|
Re: I need to score.....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 May 2002 01:36:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
436 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes:
> much like the last game project X, a clear way to score contestant who
> have not fully completed the challenge needs to be discovered.
Existing rtlToronto scoring has usually been:
For BOTH robots:
0 points for the loser
1 point each for a tie
2 points for the winner
ridicule for anyone showing up wearing a double windsor.
One possible case is where a robot A goes across but knocks the flag down,
either by mismanipulating ir or by hitting it accidentally on the side. Is
this a tie or a win? If it's a tie, we gave given Robot B a point for doing
nothing. Yet if we call it a win, then we encourage robots to sweep with a
big smacker arm that topples the flag, without trying to lift or even
cross/extend for that matter.
So here's a new way of scoring:
For EACH robot:
0 points by default
1 point for touching the flag. That means you have to at least cross or
extend something to touch the flag.
1 point for lifting the flag.
That way, a robot that crosses and lifts still gets 2, yet in situation
between Robot X (a poorly built one that can't even cross) and Robot Y (an
unreliable robot that can cross but can't repeatedly lift the flag), Y gets
to lift the flag and still get a point for making the effort.
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: I need to score.....
|
| (...) gets (...) So then one can build a folding 'flail' of some sort that can reach from the starting position to the flag on the other end. As soon as the round begins the flail (with a battery box at the end for an added kick) will start rotating (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | I need to score.....
|
| this new game coming up. (smirk) much like the last game project X, a clear way to score contestant who have not fully completed the challenge needs to be discovered. I have no good ideas (yet) except to hire or pay professional judges to score each (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
