 | | X-Bot times
|
| Hi everyone I'm just wondering if anybody is willing to post there times? Is 40 seconds still the fastest? Wow that's fast! I can't seem to get the accuracy down. I refuse to use touch sensors too. Phil :) see ya next weekend! (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: X-Bot times
|
| (...) Over at the last rtlToronto dinner meeting, Chris announced he's down to 27.6 seconds. Derek later mentioned he's estimating a ~20 second completion time for his design if everything works out. Of course, Calum's Topiary Garden(X) will (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: X-Bot times
|
| (...) Well if I can figure out all the multi-threading issues, I might actually get my bot to move. :-) Threading is something I haven't dealt with much in Java. Its very interesting, and I'm gradually getting it working. If it wasn't for wanting to (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: X-Bot times
|
| (...) My bot can do it in 25 seconds with new batteries. May be I should look into gear up my Y or try to use LegOS. So what's the problem with touch sensors? To me they are simple and obvious solutions. (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: X-Bot times
|
| (...) Hmmm.... I'm having the same problems in LegOS. You see, my robot is currently working, but if I want to speed it up, then I have to control the motors better with multitasking and motor pulsing. I have a mechanical solutionn to the accuracy (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: X-Bot times
|
| (...) If you don't mind the precision of a tree stump, sure... Calum (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: X-Bot times
|
| (...) From what I've seen threading in C is nasty. At least Java was written with multi-threading in mind. Its still not pretty but I think I'm getting the hang of it. Remember everyone, bring a print out of your source code next Saturday. I'd (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: X-Bot times
|
| (...) hang of (...) Semaphore is the key. (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: X-Bot times
|
| (...) OK, first off, I really was trying to be discreet and i only told Dave. if other over heard than that is not announcing. second, since we are now all in the open, I am down to 26.6. lastly, Bruce made an observation that Calum and i hashed (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
